Visa 10.2 - EMV Liability Shift (Non-Counterfeit)
Non-counterfeit card fraud where the chip wasn't read properly. This covers lost, stolen, or never-received cards at terminals with EMV fallback issues.
Overview
Unlike 10.1 (counterfeit), this code covers genuine cards used fraudulently when the terminal failed to read the chip.
When This Code Applies
- Lost or stolen card used at POS
- Card never received by cardholder (intercepted)
- Genuine card, unauthorized transaction
- Chip not read (swipe fallback)
Conditions for Valid Dispute
Issuer Must Verify
- Card is genuine (not counterfeit)
- Cardholder did not authorize transaction
- Card has EMV chip
- Chip was not read in transaction
Transaction Must Be
- Card-present
- Processed without reading chip
- At EMV-capable or non-EMV terminal
Time Frames
| Scenario | Dispute Window |
|---|---|
| Standard | 120 days from transaction date |
Liability Shift Rules
Merchant Liable When
- Terminal didn't read chip
- EMV fallback without proper procedure
- Staff accepted swipe without chip attempt
Issuer Liable When
- Chip was read successfully
- Proper authentication occurred
- PIN verified (if PIN-preferring card)
Difference from 10.1
| Aspect | 10.1 | 10.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Card type | Counterfeit | Genuine |
| Fraud source | Cloned card | Lost/stolen card |
| Key evidence | Chip vs swipe | Chip vs swipe |
Representment Options
1. Chip Was Read
Evidence required:
- EMV transaction log
- Cryptogram data
- Terminal certification
2. PIN Verified
Evidence required:
- PIN entry confirmation
- Terminal PIN pad log
- Correct PIN on first attempt
3. Cardholder Present
Evidence required:
- CCTV footage
- ID verification records
- Signature match
Prevention Strategies
Transaction Security
- Always use chip - Never accept swipe if chip available
- PIN preference - Enable PIN for higher security
- ID verification - For high-value transactions
Staff Training
- Chip-first policy - Always attempt chip first
- Fallback rules - Document when and why
- Suspicious behavior - Decline if customer insists on swipe
Win Rate Expectations
| Defense Type | Expected Win Rate |
|---|---|
| Chip + PIN verified | 85-95% |
| Chip read only | 70-85% |
| No chip read | Under 25% |
Common Mistakes
- Accepting swipe without chip attempt - Liability shifts immediately
- No PIN verification - Lost security layer
- Staff override of chip requirement - Creates liability
- Missing transaction logs - Can't prove chip was used
Related Codes
- 10.1 - EMV Liability Shift Counterfeit
- 10.3 - Other Fraud Card Present
- 10.4 - Card Not Present Fraud
Next Steps
Got this chargeback?
- Pull terminal logs → Was chip read? Was PIN verified?
- Check CCTV footage → Can you identify the cardholder?
- Gather evidence → Representment Workflow
- Respond within 30 days
Prevent future 10.2 chargebacks:
- Always use chip + PIN when available
- Enable PIN preference on terminals
- Install camera coverage at POS
- Review EMV requirements