Skip to main content

Fraud Prevention Vendor Landscape

TL;DR
  • Ecosystem spans multiple categories: identity verification, device intelligence, consortium data, case management, and network-level tools
  • Issuers vs merchants have different needs: real-time authorization scoring vs. post-transaction protection
  • No single vendor covers everything: serious fraud programs typically layer 3–5 complementary solutions
  • Network tools are underutilized: Visa VAA and Mastercard DI are often included in processor fees but not fully used

Introduction​

Every fraud vendor will tell you they're the solution. They're not. The market is fragmented because different attacks need different defenses. No single vendor is good at identity verification, device fingerprinting, behavioral analysis, consortium intelligence, and case management at the same time. You'll layer 3-5 tools or you'll have gaps.

If you're an issuer: You make authorization decisions in milliseconds with legacy core banking systems that are older than some of your employees. You care about authorization scoring, ATO prevention, and first-party fraud detection. Most merchant-focused content doesn't apply to you.

If you're a merchant: You care about chargebacks. Order screening before fulfillment. Chargeback guarantees that shift liability to someone else. Different problem, different vendors.

When to Buy

Under $1M/year: Don't. Your processor's built-in tools are enough. You don't have the data volume to train models or justify the cost.

$1M-$10M/year: Start with one tool. Device fingerprinting or identity verification, depending on your fraud mix. Add alert services.

Over $10M/year: You need a stack. Layer complementary solutions. The cost of fraud now exceeds the cost of tooling.

Vendor Categories at a Glance​

CategoryPrimary Use CaseKey VendorsTypical Pricing Model
Identity VerificationKYC, onboarding, step-up authSocure, Onfido, Veriff, iDenfyPer-verification ($0.50–$5)
Device FingerprintingAccount takeover, multi-accountingThreatMetrix, SEON, IPQS, Fingerprint, BioCatchPer-session or per-transaction
Consortium DataCross-institution fraud signalsLexisNexis, FICO Falcon Network, SiftSubscription + per-query
Enterprise Fraud PlatformCase management, rules engine, ML modelsNICE Actimize, Feedzai, FICO, SASAnnual license + implementation
Network Tools (Issuer)Real-time authorization scoringVisa VAA, Mastercard Decision IntelligenceUsually included via processor
Chargeback PreventionPre-dispute alerts, transaction enrichmentEthoca, Verifi (RDR/CDRN)Typically $15–40/alert via resellers
Merchant Fraud/GuaranteeOrder screening, chargeback liability shiftSignifyd, Riskified, Forter, Kount% of GMV or per-transaction

Most organizations use vendors from multiple categories. The right combination depends on your fraud mix (ATO vs. first-party vs. third-party), transaction volume, and existing infrastructure. A fintech launching from scratch will make different choices than a large issuer with decades of legacy systems.

Identity Verification​

Identity verification vendors help confirm that a person is who they claim to be, typically during account opening, high-risk transactions, or step-up authentication flows.

Socure​

Socure offers an AI-powered identity verification platform with particularly strong capabilities for synthetic identity detection. The platform covers 190+ countries and combines document verification, biometrics, and data consortium signals.

Key strengths:

  • Predictive analytics for synthetic identity fraud
  • Multi-signal approach (documents, device, behavior, data)
  • Strong adoption among major banks and fintechs
  • Consortium data from participating customers

Onfido​

Onfido focuses on document verification combined with biometric matching. The platform uses machine learning analysis with optional human review for edge cases.

Key strengths:

  • Liveness detection to prevent spoofing
  • Strong compliance focus (KYC, AML)
  • Scalable for high-volume onboarding
  • Good international document coverage

Veriff​

Veriff uses a hybrid human/AI verification model, offering video-based verification as an option for higher-assurance use cases.

Key strengths:

  • ISO 27001 and SOC II certified
  • Supports approximately 200 countries
  • Adaptable fraud prevention across industries
  • Video verification option for high-risk flows

iDenfy​

iDenfy supports over 2,500 ID document types from 190+ countries, with facial recognition and liveness detection included.

Key strengths:

  • Extensive document type coverage
  • Know Your Business (KYB) capabilities
  • AML screening integration
  • Competitive pricing for mid-market

Note: iDenfy does not include device fingerprinting. Pair with a device intelligence vendor if needed.

Key Selection Criteria​

  • Document coverage: Does the vendor support ID types for your customer base?
  • Liveness detection quality: How resistant to spoofing (photos, masks, deepfakes)?
  • API response time: What latency is acceptable for your user experience?
  • Pass rates vs. manual review: What percentage requires human review?
  • Compliance certifications: SOC 2, ISO 27001, regional requirements?

Device Fingerprinting & Intelligence​

Device fingerprinting creates unique identifiers for devices accessing your platform, enabling detection of returning fraudsters, multi-accounting, and account takeover attempts even when other identifiers change.

ThreatMetrix (LexisNexis Risk Solutions)​

ThreatMetrix, acquired by LexisNexis in 2018, combines hardware and software fingerprinting with proprietary algorithms. It uses consortium data from tens of billions of transactions across the LexisNexis network.

Key strengths:

  • Enterprise-focused with on-premises support options
  • Integrates with other LexisNexis products (Emailage, BehavioSec)
  • Massive consortium data network
  • Strong for large financial institutions

Best for: Large FIs already using the LexisNexis stack

SEON​

SEON takes a modular approach: use only what you need. The platform includes email, phone, and IP data enrichment plus social media profiling for identity signals.

Key strengths:

  • Transparent, explainable risk scoring
  • Fast API integration
  • Flexible pricing for different volumes
  • Social media footprint analysis

Best for: Fintechs and mid-market wanting flexibility

IPQS (IPQualityScore)​

IPQS scans 300+ device data points with strong capabilities for bot detection, GPS spoofing detection, and emulator identification.

Key strengths:

  • Extensive device data collection
  • Strong bot and automation detection
  • Fraud network detection
  • Competitive pricing at volume

Best for: High-volume screening with bot concerns

Fingerprint (formerly FingerprintJS)​

Fingerprint offers an open-source core with a commercial offering, focusing on browser fingerprinting with claimed 99.5% identification accuracy.

Key strengths:

  • Lightweight JavaScript implementation
  • Developer-friendly documentation and APIs
  • Transparent about methodology
  • Open-source option for evaluation

Best for: Developers wanting control and transparency

BioCatch​

BioCatch is the leader in behavioral biometrics, analyzing mouse movements, keystrokes, and navigation patterns for continuous authentication.

Key strengths:

  • Runs silently without user friction
  • Continuous authentication (not just point-in-time)
  • Strong for account takeover detection
  • Detects remote access tools and social engineering

Best for: FIs prioritizing ATO prevention

Technical Considerations
  • SDK vs JavaScript: Mobile apps need SDKs; web can use JS tags
  • Cookie-less tracking: Important as browsers phase out third-party cookies
  • Cross-browser persistence: Can you identify the same device across Chrome/Safari/Firefox?
  • Latency requirements: Real-time auth needs sub-50ms; batch can tolerate more

Consortium Data Networks​

Consortium networks aggregate fraud signals across participating institutions, enabling detection of fraud patterns that no single organization could identify alone.

LexisNexis Digital Identity Network​

LexisNexis operates one of the largest global consortiums with thousands of financial institutions participating. Through acquisitions, they've integrated Emailage (email risk), ThreatMetrix (device), BehavioSec (behavioral), and ID Analytics (identity risk) into a unified platform.

Key strengths:

  • Cross-industry fraud signals
  • Strong in North America and Europe
  • Multiple data types (device, email, phone, identity)
  • Continuous model updates from consortium learnings

FICO Falcon Intelligence Network​

FICO's Falcon Intelligence Network analyzes hundreds of billions of transactions annually. Tagged fraud data is shared across participating issuers, powering FICO Falcon Fraud Manager models.

Key strengths:

  • Focused on card fraud patterns
  • Deep integration with Falcon platform
  • Continuous model updates based on consortium data
  • Decades of issuer relationships

Sift Digital Trust Network​

Sift's consortium is more merchant-focused, with tens of thousands of participating sites and apps including major brands like Airbnb and McDonald's.

Key strengths:

  • Strong for e-commerce and marketplace fraud
  • Real-time signals across the network
  • Content and payment fraud coverage
  • Good for merchants with similar customer bases

ActimizeWatch (NICE Actimize)​

ActimizeWatch provides cross-institutional pattern detection, analyzing transactional data across participating financial service organizations.

Key strengths:

  • Part of broader Actimize AML/fraud platform
  • Focus on financial institution patterns
  • Integrated with case management workflow
Issuer Consideration

Your processor likely already contributes transaction data to one or more consortiums. The question is: are you receiving and acting on the signals back? Check with your processor about what consortium scores or flags are available in your authorization stream.

Enterprise Fraud Management Platforms​

Enterprise fraud management (EFM) platforms bundle the full stack: real-time transaction scoring, rules engines, case management, reporting, and increasingly, integrated AML functionality.

FICO Falcon Fraud Manager​

FICO Falcon is the market leader for card issuers, with 30+ years in the market protecting billions of card accounts globally. The platform combines real-time scoring, case management, and a rules engine.

Key strengths:

  • Proven track record with major issuers
  • Falcon 7.0 includes updated UI and enhanced case management
  • Patented neural network models continuously updated
  • Falcon Compromise Manager for breach detection
  • Deep processor integrations

Best for: Card issuers wanting a proven, full-featured solution

NICE Actimize​

NICE Actimize offers strong AML and fraud integration, with X-Sight platform for large financial institutions and Xceed for SMBs.

Key strengths:

  • Unified fraud + AML platform
  • AI-powered investigation automation (2024)
  • Full case management and SAR filing
  • ActimizeWatch consortium intelligence

Best for: FIs wanting unified fraud + AML

Feedzai​

Feedzai takes an AI-native, single-platform approach with its RiskOps platform covering fraud, AML, and case management.

Key strengths:

  • Modern AI architecture
  • Emphasizes model explainability (TRUST Framework)
  • Selected for ECB digital euro fraud prevention pilot
  • Strong in Europe, growing in North America

Best for: FIs prioritizing modern AI architecture

SAS Fraud Management​

SAS brings deep analytics heritage with highly customizable rules and models.

Key strengths:

  • Strong data integration capabilities
  • Enterprise-grade scalability
  • Highly customizable
  • Good for organizations with strong analytics teams

Best for: Organizations with strong analytics teams wanting customization

Industry Recognition

Forrester and Chartis consistently evaluate vendors like FICO, Feedzai, LexisNexis, NICE Actimize, and SAS in the top enterprise fraud-management segment. Specific rankings (Leader, Strong Performer, etc.) vary by wave, region, and evaluation criteria. Always request the latest analyst reports during vendor evaluation.

Card Network Fraud Tools​

Both Visa and Mastercard provide fraud detection tools that are often included in processor fees but underutilized by issuers. These network-level tools see patterns across the entire network that no single issuer could detect.

Visa Tools​

Visa Advanced Authorization (VAA)​

VAA delivers a real-time risk score with every VisaNet authorization, available to most Visa issuers through their processor.

Key capabilities:

  • Trained on global Visa transaction patterns
  • Score can be used in authorization rules or case prioritization
  • Often included in processor fees. Check if you're using it.
  • No additional integration if already on VisaNet

Verifi RDR (Rapid Dispute Resolution)​

RDR provides automated pre-chargeback resolution. Merchants set rules (e.g., auto-refund disputes under $X), and qualifying disputes are resolved before a chargeback is filed.

Key capabilities:

  • Prevents chargeback from being filed
  • Reduces dispute ratio and operational costs
  • Visa's preferred system, replacing CDRN for many use cases
  • Automated: no manual intervention once rules are set

Verifi CDRN (Cardholder Dispute Resolution Network)​

CDRN is a manual alert system with a typical 72-hour response window, covering Visa and some Discover transactions.

Key capabilities:

  • US-focused coverage
  • Merchant must manually process refunds
  • Being supplanted by RDR for many merchants
  • Still relevant for merchants wanting review before refund

Order Insight​

Order Insight provides transaction details to issuers, helping cardholders recognize legitimate charges and reducing "friendly fraud" from non-recognition.

Key capabilities:

  • Integrates with issuer customer service systems
  • Reduces "I don't recognize this charge" disputes
  • Preventive rather than reactive

Mastercard Tools​

Decision Intelligence (DI)​

DI provides real-time authorization scoring trained on global Mastercard transaction patterns, analyzing cardholder behavior patterns.

Key capabilities:

  • Available through processors
  • Network-wide visibility on spending patterns
  • Complements issuer-specific models

Decision Intelligence Pro (2024)​

The GenAI-enhanced version of Decision Intelligence uses recurrent neural networks to analyze entity relationships.

Key capabilities:

  • Mastercard reports up to ~20% improvement in fraud detection at comparable false-positive rates
  • Analyzes historical spending patterns and merchant relationships
  • Sub-50ms decisioning
  • Uses generative AI for pattern recognition

Transaction Fraud Monitoring (TFM)​

TFM is acquirer-focused (not issuer), providing pre-authorization risk scores to help acquirers identify risky merchants and transactions.

Ethoca Alerts​

Ethoca provides pre-dispute notification to merchants with global coverage, especially strong in EU, Canada, and Asia.

Key capabilities:

  • Typical 24-72 hour response window
  • Manual process: merchant must act on alert
  • Complements Verifi for Mastercard-heavy volumes

Consumer Clarity​

Consumer Clarity provides transaction detail enrichment for issuers, including merchant logos, itemized receipts, and location data.

Key capabilities:

  • Helps cardholders recognize legitimate charges
  • Reduces friendly fraud disputes
  • Integrates with issuer customer service

Mastercard Threat Intelligence (2025)​

Mastercard's newest offering combines cyber and payment fraud signals, integrating Recorded Future (acquired 2024) threat intelligence.

Key capabilities:

  • Card testing detection with real-time alerts
  • Digital skimming intelligence
  • Merchant threat intelligence
  • Payment ecosystem threat reports
For Issuers

Start by auditing what network tools you're already paying for through your processor. Many issuers have access to VAA scores or DI scores but aren't incorporating them into authorization rules or case management workflows. This is often the lowest-hanging fruit for fraud reduction.

Merchant-Focused Solutions​

While this guide focuses on issuer needs, understanding merchant-side fraud solutions helps issuers anticipate dispute patterns and collaborate on fraud reduction.

Chargeback Guarantee Providers​

Signifyd​

Signifyd offers a 100% financial guarantee on approved orders with performance-based pricing (% of approved GMV).

Key strengths:

  • Strong in enterprise retail
  • Return Abuse Prevention product
  • Payment Optimization offerings

Riskified​

Riskified provides chargeback guarantee plus Dispute Resolve (representment) with performance-based pricing.

Key strengths:

  • Strong account management reputation
  • Auth Rate Enhance helps improve authorization rates
  • Dispute resolution included

Forter​

Forter provides real-time decisioning for enterprise e-commerce through an identity-based approach.

Key strengths:

  • Global fraud prevention network
  • Strong in luxury and high-value retail

Kount (Equifax)​

Kount combines device intelligence with identity verification, with strong presence in gaming and digital goods.

Key strengths:

  • Customizable automation and rules
  • Good for digital goods and gaming
  • Part of Equifax data ecosystem
G2 and Review Sites

Both Signifyd and Riskified are highly rated on G2 and similar platforms for fraud detection and customer support. Ratings fluctuate over time, so verify current scores during evaluation. Generally, Signifyd tends to rank slightly higher for large-enterprise retail, while Riskified is often noted for account management quality.

Market Dynamics & Trends (2024–2025)​

The fraud prevention market is evolving rapidly. Key trends affecting vendor selection:

GenAI Adoption​

  • Mastercard Decision Intelligence Pro uses generative AI
  • NICE Actimize launched AI-Powered Fraud Investigations (Sept 2024)
  • Vendors adding GenAI for alert summarization, case drafting, SAR generation
  • Caution: GenAI also enables more sophisticated fraud (deepfakes, synthetic identities)

Deepfake & Synthetic Identity Threats​

  • iProov reported 704% increase in deepfake face swaps (2024)
  • Driving investment in advanced liveness detection
  • Behavioral biometrics gaining importance
  • Document verification alone no longer sufficient

Market Consolidation​

  • LexisNexis continues acquisition strategy: Emailage, ThreatMetrix, BehavioSec, ID Analytics all now integrated
  • Equifax acquired Kount
  • Mastercard acquired Ethoca (2019) and Recorded Future (2024)
  • Visa acquired Verifi (2019)
  • Trend toward integrated platforms vs. point solutions

First-Party Fraud Focus​

  • Mastercard First-Party Trust program
  • Enhanced compelling evidence requirements (Visa CE 3.0)
  • Growing recognition that "friendly fraud" is a major loss driver
  • Vendors adding return abuse and policy abuse detection

Regulatory Pressure​

  • Model governance and explainability requirements increasing
  • Fair lending considerations for fraud models
  • CFPB BNPL interpretive rule extends Reg Z-style protections
  • APP fraud reimbursement rules (UK, expanding)

Next Steps​

Evaluating vendors by category?

  1. Review identity verification vendors - Socure, Onfido, Veriff
  2. Explore device fingerprinting - ThreatMetrix, SEON, BioCatch
  3. Understand consortium data - LexisNexis, FICO, Sift

Issuers: Using network tools?

  1. Audit Visa tools - VAA, Verifi RDR, Order Insight
  2. Check Mastercard tools - Decision Intelligence, Ethoca
  3. Ask processor what's included - Often bundled but unused

Merchants: Building fraud stack?

  1. Start with chargeback guarantees - Signifyd, Riskified
  2. Follow selection guide - Evaluation process
  3. Layer complementary solutions - 3-5 tools typical

See Also​